Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Writing (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Daniel.Bryant 06:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Writing (film)

I believe this article to be either a spoof or a fake. I can find no evidence of a film of this name being in production anywhere. The cast list looks suspiciously good, too good. The supposed poster that is in the article is suspect as well, a close examination of the ink bottle in the top corner will show that the writing is backwards because the image has been flipped. Would a professional film company allow a sloppy mistake like that out in to the open? The supplied link to yahoo is merely a message page. It's a total fake. X201 21:12, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete IMDB has nothing on this. The single link in the article [1] is a post on a yahoo message board...which doesn't really prove anything. The spelling in that post is unprofessional as well. The director, Stephen Daldry, is currently in pre-production on The Adventures of Kavalier and Clay so I'm not sure how he would have time to do another film and have it released in 2007. Probable hoax. IrishGuy ^talk 21:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Irishguy. This is either a hoax, or an incredibly non-notable project. -- Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 21:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm almost certain that it's a hoax. The font used in the "poster" is a typical Windows/Mac font, not something fancy that would be used in an actual poster. Also, there's the aforementioned issue of the backwards ink bottle. --Hnsampat 00:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is definitely a hoax. The originarator of the article is a 15-yr-old from So. Covina, CA, whom has been flooding assorted film boards with fake reports on ths film. This article is misleading, poorly written and ought to be deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stepford (talk • contribs) 01:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.