Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wriothesley's Chronicle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Charles Wriothesley. ✗plicit 12:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wriothesley's Chronicle[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:NBOOK. I personally would prefer a merge to Charles Wriothesley, but given that the apparent lack of independent notability makes this an appropriate venue, I felt it would be more effective to take it here than directly propose a merge. Plus, this way anyone who actually wants it deleted can have a voice. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 07:42, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and England. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 07:42, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Charles Wriothesley. In addition to the lack of independent NBOOK notability, the Chronicle is part of the reason that Mr Wriothesley is notable, and it needs a stronger mention there. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 15:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Srnec (talk) 21:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, as above, seems sensible. Bondegezou (talk) 13:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, per Last1in. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 11:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - as argued above this seems like a sensible way forward for both articles. Dunarc (talk) 21:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.