Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrestling at the 2014 Summer Youth Olympics – Boys' freestyle 63 kg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:07, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestling at the 2014 Summer Youth Olympics – Boys' freestyle 63 kg[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wrestling at the 2014 Summer Youth Olympics – Girls' freestyle 52 kg

Relisting two from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrestling at the 2014 Summer Youth Olympics – Girls' freestyle 46 kg for separate discussion. These two have some data entered unlike the rest which were all blank. This is a procedural nomination and should not be taken as a call to delete. SpinningSpark 18:51, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The comments on the original AfD questioned the notability of all the individual weight classes for this event not just the empty ones. There is no point in having two isolated weight classes.Peter Rehse (talk) 19:23, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 19:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete boy's freestyle 63kg as all content on that page is already included in Wrestling at the 2014 Summer Youth Olympics. Keep girl's freestyle 52kg as it has substantial further content. Der yck C. 09:15, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both Neither article has anything but results and neither article has any significant coverage.Mdtemp (talk) 19:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both As I said at the original discussion, there's nothing to indicate individual divisions of a youth event are notable. The only sources for either article provide just the results, but no significant independent coverage. Papaursa (talk) 04:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.