Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrestling General Board (IGN)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 13:28, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestling General Board (IGN)[edit]

Unverifiable original research. Not anywhere near notable enough for its own article. At most, it deserves a couple sentences inIGN, though entirely different content. All the content right now is absurdly POV and certainly OR. Delete as such. Wickethewok 02:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Cruft, cruft cruft! Adam 1212 02:51, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete per nomination. Cheesehead 1980 14:16, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Indef blocked socka, see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Spotteddogsdotorg. -Splash - tk Splash - tk
Delete: Forum narcissism. When the power goes out, it ceases to exist. Geogre 14:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 01:07, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 01:24, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is already mentioned as a popular board on the IGN article and there's not much more encyclopedic you can say about it. Ace of Sevens 01:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the POV makes my head spin. -Colonial One 14:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Combination 15:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. See Next-Gen Gaming and GameFAQs Legends Board for instances where a board within a board was deleted. Hbdragon88 00:52, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete on the gounds that it has been speedied already and has been remade. Tagged. Not notable in any way. -- Steel 00:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have declined this request because a speedy deletion doesn't fall under G4 or deletion policy. Yank sox 05:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.