Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wren Avenue Elementary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mount Diablo Unified School District. This appears to be a series of nominations (Ygnacio Valley Elementary School, Valley View Middle School, El Dorado Middle School, Wren Avenue Elementary School) so I've redirected them all for the sake of consistency and navigational purposes. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wren Avenue Elementary School[edit]

No claim of noteworthiness, no independent reliable sources, and no non-directory content. Fails WP:SCHOOLS3. Prod disputed, without addressing concerns. Shimeru 21:20, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails to provide non-directory/prospectus information: this is not a directory or a prospectus, it is an encyclopedia. — Haeleth Talk 23:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. wikipediatrix 02:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Google and other searches turn up no indepdent sources that have any non-directory information. I won't object to a redirect in principle. JoshuaZ 04:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails both WP:SCHOOLS and WP:SCHOOLS3. Trusilver 07:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mount Diablo Unified School District. Yet more schoolcruft, fails all plausible notability criteria, but I think a redirect is perfectly reasonable. (Might also encourage people to start expanding some of the district articles, which badly need it, rather than simply, blindly, creating more and more pointless stubs.) Xtifr _tälk 12:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mount Diablo Unified School District per Xtifr, it is a reasonable solution. Yamaguchi先生 03:43, 22 November 2006
Delete. Cruft like this makes me want to gouge my own eyes out. WMMartin 16:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete YAschoolcruftarticle Pete Fenelon 01:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Calling something "schoolcruft" isn't any more of a valid argument than claiming all schools are notable. JoshuaZ 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Delete nn school. See my comments at this AfD for rationale. Eusebeus 12:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect seems to make sense here. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.