Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wpkg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Dpkg. After 2 relistings, the consensus is to merge into the software from which it was cloned. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wpkg

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There appears to only be primary sources present, the best secondary coverage I could drudge up was some news reports about Chinese netizens being redirected to their site after logging in with facebook involving an overseas hack^[1], other than that, there doesn't appear to be much coverage, about the topic directly, so mostly just WP:GNG. AtlasDuane (talk) 15:05, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Wester, Michael. "What the Heck is wpkg.org, and Why Are We Being Redirected to It? | the Beijinger". Retrieved 10 October 2018.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into dpkg. Not notable enough on its own, but relevant to the target article. Only the lead section needs to be merged. — Newslinger talk 05:44, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 09:29, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: to dpkg. I think I am roughly on the same lines as Newslinger ... anything more than a one or two line section would be disruption to the target and worse than not merging. I've added a passing independent ref to the article which would help support the merge. I think I would like current page turned into a DAB because of a likely need to disambiguate to avoid confusion ... in fact the existance of two similarly named but confusingly different packages in the same space is driving me towards this approach. Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:03, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd really like to be on absolutely on top of the difference between wpkg and WPKG. Simply looking at 1 and 2 may relate to WPKG ... I findmyself saying may though. (Wring this the 2nd points to WPKG so that sorts that one). It may be WPKG needs to be improved. I have become in a rush so I apologise for this this line but feel it is relevant.Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:15, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. This should definitely not be deleted outright, per wp:CONSONANTS. --Doncram (talk) 17:44, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] Wester, Michael. "What the Heck is wpkg.org, and Why Are We Being Redirected to It? | the Beijinger". Retrieved 10 October 2018.

[1]