Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wormhole Series
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
appears to be a non-notable future computer game Hawaiian717 18:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. [Check Google hits] 38 Googlehits, very few of which are even relevant to the subject of the article. "OMBSoft" gets 4 hits. ... discospinster talk 18:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
X_2> This game is already finished and has a pending sequel. I've cleaned up the article a bit to reflect this. It may be 'non-notable' in the US etc., but in some parts of eastern England (a.k.a where I am) it is real and is quite popular. I also believe that judging this article on its Google rank or results (whether Wikipedia policy or not) is an extremely poor way to check an articles accuracy. It is factual information and therefore encyclopaedia-worthy. If you erase this simply due to its 'unpopularity' it doesn't really reflect what an encyclopaedia actually is.
- Delete per not WP:NOTABLE. Hello32020 20:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. As for "what an encyclopaedia actually is", Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. -- Fan-1967 21:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:N. At least for now that a yahoo search yields no published review (or whatever) on this topic. It should be recreated should the game garners fame.Feureau 21:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.