Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwide Paranormal Reporting Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per author request (trying to blank the page) and per WP:CSD#G11. Sandstein 05:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Worldwide Paranormal Reporting Center[edit]

According to the removed prod, "Not notable - no alexa ranking, only relevant hit is the myspace page, has only been around since summer 2006, and as article says, this page is "trying to market its existence" FisherQueen (Talk) 19:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia not a search engine, WWPRC is an online database archiving paranormal activity throughout the world, it can't be in Wikipedia because it is not high enough in the alexa ranking?? It doesn't matter how long it has been around, people wants to report paranormal activities and they want to know what WWPRC is and as an encyclopedia, wikipedia should provide the information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Studgate (talk • contribs)
An online reporting center needs people to report things, why they should not want to market their existence???, if nobody reports, there is no reporting. This is not even the point, youtube is only 1 year old but nobody says anything about how old are they, why??? don't know but it is a shame to delete an article about an online database reporting paranormal activities... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Studgate (talk • contribs)
- Your question is irrelevant. Wikipedia is not an advertising billboard. Uncle G 22:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If it were notable, the article would need a complete rewrite to remove the appallingly unencyclopedic level of POV, puffery, we this and our that. But it isn't. CiaranG 20:34, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Spam. -- RHaworth 20:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, their so called website is a form, they use MySpace, which is a mark against any self-respecting organization, the article uses first person, four Google hits. Spam. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Would it not be appropriate to speedy this per A7 and/or WP:SNOW? The author has now attempted to blank the article, but been reverted by a bot. CiaranG 21:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like advertising. CSD:G11? Too many "Ours" and "you" in it for comfort. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 21:51, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been included in the WP:PARA AFD noticeboard ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 21:51, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.