Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ^Complex/_Rational 14:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Worldle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only source is a single Washington Post article, fails WP:SIGCOV DirtyHarry991 (talk) 11:26, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games and Geography. DirtyHarry991 (talk) 11:26, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Forbes staff piece, literally the FIRST hit in Gnews [1]. then this in the WP [2], this in USA Today via Yahoo News [3] Oaktree b (talk) 18:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't think I've ever met any topic where a WaPo article is the only RS for that topic. This clearly doesn't break that streak, either. Jclemens (talk) 21:09, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Got Rock Paper Shotgun coverage and PC Gamer coverage, which shows notability beyond a shadow of a doubt. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:45, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Clearly meets WP:GNG through the sources provided by multiple users here. WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. Let'srun (talk) 01:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Although this article is short and low on information, it can easily be expanded with the sources above. I'd be happy to do so. Tarantula^TM (speak with me) (my legacy) 15:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Oaktree and zxcvbnm.

𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 ☎️ 📄 13:51, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Possibly merge with Wordle, but this is not an AFD case.

IgelRM (talk) 00:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.