Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Orders of Knighthood and Merit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 17:03, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

World Orders of Knighthood and Merit[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Nothing in the article to suggest notability. Nothing on Google scholar, books, or news to suggest notability. Cannot find reliable third party secondary sources to determine notability. See talk page for further discussion Decstop (talk) 16:46, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think this is notable enough to have an article and looking at WP:NB I don't think it meets the criteria set out there. The book is mentioned at Burke's Peerage which I think is sufficient so possibly redirect to that article. - dwc lr (talk) 15:00, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nominator.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 05:54, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't rate alongside Burke's Peerage, Debrett's and Almanach de Gotha as an established, widely known work of reference, AFAIK (despite assertions on the talk page). Not usual to have articles on sources unless there is evidence of notability. Maybe include useful info elsewhere, with redirects? Folks at 137 (talk) 11:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.