Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Konkani Hall Of Fame

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to World Konkani Centre. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

World Konkani Hall Of Fame

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find significant independent sources that assert notability of this monument. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep/Merge' I can find some information, but if kept this needs to be stubbed. A Wikipedia should not be their gallery of honorees. It's way too image heavy. Also needs to be rewritten to sound less like a brochure. If it's a copyvio, the source isn't turning up via google. So in essence I'm saying the topic is notable, I'm just not sure this is the article we need on the subect. If not kept, perhaps a merge back into World Konkani Centre which has a section on the HOF until it's ready to be spun out? StarM 02:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:06, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to World Konkani Centre#World Konkani Hall Of Fame. The section in that article is sufficient. I can find very littl ein the way of soruces covering the hall of fame. Oddly enough, there is this article about Wikipedian that mention the contribution of all the images that we see in the article. Although not a reason for deletion, it does raise the issue of WP:COI. -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 03:33, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rename/edit A list of hall of fame members is reasonable, as at least half the people here seem to be notable. I'm not sure if a gallery like this is explicitly prohibited by style guides, but a bare list is ok by list policy. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Can somebody point me to the sources that establish notability? There is one listed in the article, and I'm not really seeing much else of substance. As for all the images, I'd say it is contrary to WP:NOTGALLERY. A list of inductees into a notable hall of fame is a valid element for the article, and a select few images for illustration would be appropriate but not this amount. For an example, consider List of members of the Baseball Hall of Fame. -- Whpq (talk) 12:02, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.