Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Domination (book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

World Domination (book)[edit]

Self-published books with no claim of meeting WP:Fiction. Contested prod. Fabrictramp 21:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I don't think an A7 speedy deletion can be sustained, though. Stifle (talk) 21:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. NF24^{(radio me!}_{Editor review)} 21:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Doubtful secondary sources exist to establish notability for something like this. Doctorfluffy 03:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note - user indefinitely blocked as disruptive sockpuppet. — xDanielx ^T/_C 22:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Fiction is not the guideline that applies -- that's for fictional things not works of fiction. (There's enough confusion going around without adding to it with careless references.) The relevant notability guideline is WP:BK, and since this doesn't come close to meeting it, at least not yet, delete. —Quasirandom 22:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction! That's what I get for not taking the extra second to double check myself. :) --Fabrictramp 13:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.