Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Carrot Museum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. W.marsh 04:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World Carrot Museum[edit]

This doesn't meet any WP:WEB criteria, and fails to claim any degree of notability. Two self-referential citations, and one twice removed link to not-notable op-ed. The article is about one man's carrot collating. Has already been prod'd -Tiswas^(t/c) 17:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - articles from Cleveland Plain Dealer and Dave Barry indicate notability. This should be fleshed out some more, though. B.Wind 01:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per B.Wind. It is okay to point to the website about the subject if the page that is linked to is a news article by an outside source. Has nothing to do with self-reference. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Heck, even Dave Barry did a write-up of it. (Call his work "trivial"? Have at it.) --Oakshade 20:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I prod'd this before, but the Dave Barry article satisfied WP:V and WP:N for me. i kan reed 03:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I wasn't initially aware of Dave Barry's notability or provenance as a journalist. To be fair, the article only mentions the museum (and I use the term loosely) in passing (I've added to the article that the homepage article is from the Miami Herald). - Tiswas^(t/c) 10:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.