Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workz Group
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 11:30, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Workz Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:NORG and notably WP:ORGDEPTH the sources are a mixture of press releases routine coverage and churnalism. Fails WP:GNG nothing of interest found in a BEFORE search. Article created by a WP:SPA that seems to have a very clear WP:COI according to their username. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:00, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. I could find one source[1] however if it was any credible (for signifying WP:GNG) then we would be creating many more similar articles. Rzvas (talk) 20:50, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Kleuske (talk) 10:36, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.