Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Words that you take away e and add ing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. A1 Acroterion (talk) 13:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Words that you take away e and add ing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It might be suitable for wikiversity, but not for WP. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 09:27, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, if not speedy delete. This might qualify under lack of context (A1). Before I add tags I figure I'll ask to make sure it's the right tag for this. Either way, there's absolutely no encyclopedic value for this. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:49, 19 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Delete I don't think it really fits in a speedy category, but perhaps we can deal with it by SNOW--it is hopelessly unencyclopedic DGG ( talk ) 10:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Gerund#Verb_patterns_with_the_gerund which is a similar topic. Warden (talk) 10:54, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per Tokyogirl79. No purpose of dragging this discussion any longer. Till I Go Home (talk) 11:43, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.