Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodland theme park
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Copy will be sent to Shoessss as requested. Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:27, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Woodlands theme park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Could easily be an a7-inc but with work could become an actual article. thats why I didnt CSD it Katanada (talk) 17:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with no prejudice to recreation I agree with the nom that this could become an actual article, but in its current form, it's not even a valid stub: it has no sources or assertion of notability. If sources proving notability are found and this can be developed into something that doesn't resemble a vanity page or ad, I'm fine with it being recreated. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 17:54, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep–for the moment. I will work on it as this Afd progresses. However, if I do get dragged away, and the decision is made todelete (which I can understand with the article in its present state), will the closing administrator send a copy to my subpage to remind me to revisit. Thanks ShoesssS Talk 18:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]- :::Comment - Struck Keep. Just no time to work on it at the moment. However, will the closing administrator send a copy to my subpage to remind me to revisit. Thanks ShoesssS Talk 11:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with no prejudice. Simple case of no assertion of notability. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with recreation at later date with sources.Yobmod (talk) 10:10, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.