Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodland edge-A beautiful painting of Reny Vettical.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. No stretching needed - speedy delete as spam. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:15, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Woodland edge-A beautiful painting of Reny Vettical.jpg

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I just checked the speedy deletion criteria, and it looks like the article is not covered by them (unless we stretch them), so I have to go here. The article is an unsourced personal essay about a painting of an author who has no Wikipedia article and unknown notability. For the time being, the notability of the painting has not been demonstrated. Ymblanter (talk) 07:27, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The editor has created a series of similar pages.Xx236 (talk) 07:39, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete I have just CSD-ed one of their other so-called articles, as being close to A11, and have written them a clear note on their talk page not to create encyclopaedia pages of this sort ever again. I agree this page doesn't quite meet CSD criteria. But there's no place for this type of page in an encyclopaedia. Nick Moyes (talk) 09:32, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.