Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodhaven Lakes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 15:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Woodhaven Lakes[edit]
- Woodhaven Lakes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable place with unverified claim of world's largest. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by EagleFan (talk • contribs) 18:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE. Non-notable with unverified claim. EagleFan 18:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Being the largest camping resort in the world would make this "notable." The official government Sublette, Illinois website supports the world's largest camping resort claim. [1] and the official Illinois Environmental Protection Agency website does too. [2] --Oakshade 01:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Oakshade. EagleFan, this "unverified claim," as you put it, was referenced when you nominated this for deletion. -Seinfreak37 16:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Uh, not true. The only source was the private organization's own website. Hardly an independent source and does not meat wiki standards. The new source is sketchy at best, with the word "considered" in the referenced statement. EagleFan 16:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, I am correct. See the page when you made the afd. There is a link source provided just after the claim in question. Now, a second source has been provided, one from the city, one from the state. -Seinfreak37 17:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The "world's largest campsite" claim seems to check out as per Seinfreak37, and even discounting that it seems big enough to count as a de facto community at least as notable as plenty of others (over 10000 Google hits excluding Wikipedia & mirrors). - Iridescenti (talk to me!) 22:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.