Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Won't Hold Back (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (non-admin closure), housekeeping close. Protonk (talk) 16:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Won't Hold Back (album)[edit]

Fails WP:MUSIC. Not notable without substantial coverage in reliable, third-party sources. None provided, none found. Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:30, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 19:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Links are links. If they are helping with page than nothing is wrong. Sheard has been uploading snippet songs on what will be on the album. They posted on her myspace. Usercreate (talk) 21:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC#Albums & WP:CRYSTAL. Recreate without prejudice once we have a confirmed track listing with references that establish notability. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 01:36, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment 1st of all, this page was not recreated, stupid. 2nd, This page only sites one source and that pertains to when Sheard starting recording the new album. Usercreate (talk) 01:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply, First of all, please don't call me stupid. Second, "recreate without prejudice" means, if the page is deleted I don't have an issue with it being recreated in the future once the wikipedia notability criteria are met since it is a crystal ball issue we're dealing with here. And thirdly, your reference passes verifiability, yes she's doing a new album. Artists are always looking to do their next album. What hasn't been proven is, nor can I find by searching online, is why this album is notable per the guideline set out in WP:CRYSTAL & WP:MUSIC#Albums. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 04:07, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The fact also that you've just been banned for being a sockpuppet yourself, and that you also accused me of being one on my talk page, means I'm now going to do this....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA....Ok, I've finished now. Thank you. p.s. if that gets me a 24hr ban for not being civil, it was worth it :-) Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 13:20, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Created by Soccermeko sock: see checkuser result.
Kww (talk) 12:39, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.