Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women's Party (Turkey)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of political parties in Turkey. Modussiccandi (talk) 06:34, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women's Party (Turkey)[edit]

Women's Party (Turkey) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG. Kadı Message 08:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:41, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect and merge into List of political parties in Turkey, as the party lacks significant coverage in sources to be worthy of an article, as discussed in a recent trwiki AfD. Having encyclopedic content does not exempt articles from passing the GNG. ~StyyxTalk? 23:13, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per Styyx and Beccaynr. Aintabli (talk) 22:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - apparently insignificant party with no elected representatives. Searching for Kadın Partisi, I mostly found articles about historical women's parties [1], articles on women's participation in AK Party [2], and an opinion piece that opens with the lament Neden kocaman bir kadın partisi yok--Why is there no big women's party. I was able to find this source which is essentially just reprinting a statement from the organization, and here TRT mentions them briefly in a list of parties investigated by the authorities. Based on the article itself, which cites only primary sources, the party's membership is...zero? Per a government database? Elections are inherently notable; parties are organizations that need to attain coverage to become notable, and lowering standards in this area means playing fast and loose with potential political misinformation that we have no way of verifying. signed, Rosguill talk 05:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.