Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolseley elm
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 20:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable tree. Computerjoe's talk 20:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete, just about the most non-notable thing I can think of. --Joey Roe 21:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Not speediable, there is a claim made to notability JoshuaZ 22:08, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I think that I shall never see, a tree with notability. Fan1967 23:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Someday someone will translate no:Kongebjørka (King's birch) from the Norwegian Wikipedia. Punkmorten 11:13, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- General Sherman tree, however Delete this one.
- The above was me. Dsmdgold 14:09, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for that. I was going to use {{unsigned}}, but you saved me the hassle! Computerjoe's talk 15:35, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above was me. Dsmdgold 14:09, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 04:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Ardenn 01:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.