Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfgang Klietmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:39, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfgang Klietmann

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This really is not my area of expertise, but I struggle to see what he is notable for, and there seems to be no independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:NACADEMIC. Edwardx (talk) 00:25, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete His main notable achievement seems to have been founding the Institute of Laboratory Medicine, which no longer exists. Likewise, 200 publications/conferences isn't particularly notable for a late-stage academic; speaking of which, he's a "Lecturer," not a professor. Although he has worked in rabies/infectious disease, he has not made any notable achievements in the area. This page overall reads like a resume to me. Furthermore, the original article seems to have been written in 2006 by someone related to Klietmann, as that person also wrote a page entitled "Maximilian klietmann" that was later deleted. Allopathie (talk) 07:33, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this resume. Trillfendi (talk) 16:11, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 16:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 16:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 16:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 16:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.