Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolf mail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. No reliable sources to prove he passes WP:MUSIC. I've looked too, but can find little. Black Kite 20:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wolf mail

Highly promotional and non-neutral article on a non-notable musician. I could find no reliable third party sources pertaining to him, and this article has been uncategorized and tagged for refs since 2007 at least. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article appears to be copied from here. He may be notable, he headlined the 2006 Narooma Blues Festival, attendance 16000 and was covered in Central Coast Express. I suspect he has a niche notability in blues music, judging from various fan sites I found he seems to have toured the world repeatedly with some success. But the current article is probably a copyright violation. Ryan Paddy (talk) 23:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still no proof that he charted (as I see has been added to the article). The notability, if present, is very thin here. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete I suspect he's notable, but sources are thin (and mostly not independant) and I don't know where to look for proof of charting. This article is a wp:copyvio so would have to be stubbed if it was kept. Ryan Paddy (talk) 00:29, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Scientizzle 15:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As there are no reliable sources cited, I am persuaded that the article does not comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.