Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WoWWiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was on WHEELS!!!...Opps, I mean, keep. :P Mailer Diablo 02:15, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WoWWiki[edit]

This is just an article about a WoW wiki. It's not important enough for a Wikipedia article and doesn't belong here. A Clown in the Dark 02:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: WoWWiki is one of the biggest fansites for World of Warcraft. Many WoW articles on wikipedia reference it. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 02:33, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per CyberSkull; notable Wiki --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 02:37, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep When I was still playing WoW I actually visited this site more often than Wikipedia itself. WoW has a huge fanbase and this Wiki managed to establish itself early enough that it became one of the definitive fan sites for the game. Which, incidentally, is the exact same thing I said when Template:Wowwiki came up for TfD (Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 February 3#Template:Wowwiki). –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 02:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Alexa ranking of 7,913. I know these aren't officially used, but this is a pretty good alexa ranking and indicates this is a popular website. --Xyzzyplugh 02:56, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This site has an alexa ranking of about 7,000. It's plenty notable. --BWD^(talk) 02:58, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with WoW --MacRusgail 04:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I don't see why a Wiki wouldn't deserve an article. Royboy crashfan 06:04, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It's already link from a prominent place in our WOW article, I'm not sure its own article really provides any significant information. --Hetar 09:48, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, all wikis are notable. --Ter e nc e Ong 14:31, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would just like to say that in this particular instance, how is this wiki any different from a common fansite? Really the only difference between this wiki and a fansite is the fact that it's a wiki. According to wikipedia policy, fansites should only be allowed if they actually had a change on the game. I think anyway, but i can't remember what page i got that from so i may be wrong. | A Clown in the Dark 22:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not all wikis are notable, but this is. Punkmorten 07:52, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.