Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WizeHive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WizeHive

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This software-as-service website is covered only in two brief blog posts. While they are on notable blogs, one of the posts just points to the other. Although they are linked as "reviews" in the article, they don't really rise to that level. WP:NOT#NEWS about startups. Pcap ping 07:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 07:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 07:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 07:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete advertisement if nothing else Alan - talk 00:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, unambiguous advertising and web content with no minimal claim of importance. More of the "project management" slough. WizeHive also proves task integrated management where users can organize and manage themselves and optionally their co-workers. They can assign and manage tasks for each workspace independently or organize and manage their own activities across all workspaces. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.