Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/With Dead Hands Rising

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:50, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

With Dead Hands Rising[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage in reliable sources that is independent of the subject. The best is http://www.metalinjection.net/show-recap/dead-hands-rising-farewell otherwise, I found a lot of WP:ROUTINE coverage or blog entries. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:06, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. The band has an entry in Garry Sharpe-Young's book New Wave of American Heavy Metal, and I also found an Alternative Press review, but not much else. The tendency for metal bands to get more coverage in print sources than online reliable sources may mean there's more out there. --Michig (talk) 10:19, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As near as I can tell, New Wave of American Heavy Metal is published by its author's own vanity press, Zonda Books. I don't think it should be considered anymore significant than, say, a blog, regardless of how authoritative its contents may be. ShelbyMarion (talk) 17:13, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:14, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:31, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.