Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wispin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 08:52, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wispin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:Notability, does not receive coverage from reliable sources significantly. AdrianGamer (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Ugly stub, but there are several reviews from vetted video game sources including TouchArcade, Pocket Gamer, 148Apps (and AppSpy), via Metacritic. Not a super strong case, but three reviews is usually the threshold, as there should be enough to write a decent article about the app. czar ⨹ 15:34, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Six reviews on Metacritic. I'd say that anything that gets that much attention on Metacritic is notable. Metacritic doesn't index blogs. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Metacritic actually does index sites we consider less than reliable. The aforementioned sites are good, though. czar ⨹ 13:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Move Would make alot more sense to start an article on the developer, Grumpyface Studios and have this be a section of it. This current one could redirect there then. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 18:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This game has enough sources to meet the general notability guideline and warrant its own article separate from the developer (which appears to only have passing mentions in a WP:VG/RS custom Google search). This is to say that this game is more notable than its developers. czar ⨹ 18:36, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Game has only passing mentions at the references listed and a few reviews. WordSeventeen (talk) 17:38, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Three reviews from WP:VG/RS vetted sources (as mentioned above) have been the precedent for sufficiency. czar ⨹ 18:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:48, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.