Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiska

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The only delete !vote after two relists and three keep !votes based on darthbunk's sources criticizes the "tabloid-like" coverage but does not dispute that those are reliable source nor that there is such coverage. So Why 06:56, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiska[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed asylum claims are not bases for wikipedia blps - especially when the source is the discredited daily mail. No other claim for notability. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T/C) 20:43, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T/C) 20:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T/C) 20:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T/C) 20:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 16:36, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Is a pass for GNG, as sources show (not only the infamous Daily Mail, but Kyiv Post on the page, or in various countries : ibtimes, or [1] , [2], [3], [4], etc.) .darthbunk pakt dunft 15:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- not rs and blp1e applies. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. Sorry, is that a comment on the links I provide? if so, I can not understand a word of it. If not, feel free to clarify it for other readers, if you want to be sure to be understood.darthbunk pakt dunft 20:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Darthbunk Pakt Dunft: "rs" = reliable sources ("not rs" = WP:NOTRS); "blp1e" = WP:BLP1E. @Spartaz: WP:WTF? OMG! TMD TLA. ARG! — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 05:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! Thanks for the light. But of course these are reliable sources (Yes rs). Die Tageszeitung+O Dia+Ansa=RS! & blp1e (a person known for one event and one event only) does not apply here, it's not one event, it's her one life (failed asylum, Femen support, iconic status, not to mention her porn career, etc). See other wikis, for example the German one.darthbunk pakt dunft 08:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:31, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per darthbunk and WP:BLP1E does not apply because of its criteria 2 since she is a former porn star and is described as a national celebrity in her country, not exactly a low-profile individual. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:32, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep RS seems to point to noteability. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- the coverage listed above is tabloid-like; the subject has not achieved anything significant to warrant an encyclopedia entry just yet. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:11, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.