Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wired Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wired Records[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of secondary sources. The article cites only two sources (both of which are dead links and appear to have been primary sources). Baronet13 (talk) 01:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - nothing additional of value found on the internet, not notable. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 02:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Dead links for a minor company. BD2412 T 05:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG Jinian (talk) 18:44, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and Germany. AllyD (talk) 07:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Again and again, people bring AfDs for record labels founded by clearly notable musicians; there's no utility to having a redlink here. The content should be ported over and a redirect established. Chubbles (talk) 03:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with what?Baronet13 (talk) 08:15, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.