Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winter Haven Plane Crash
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:00, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Winter Haven Plane Crash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Event entirely fails WP:NOT#NEWS. Deprodded. Abductive (reasoning) 07:57, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails every criteria at WP:AIRCRASH. Indeed, this is so trivial that it don't think it even merits inclusion as a bullet point on a (presently non-existent) list of incidents at the Winter Haven's Gilbert Airport article. Thryduulf (talk) 16:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Well, it's a cool picture [1]. And I'm glad nobody was badly hurt. But we can't have an article every time a small plane has an accident. Mandsford (talk) 21:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Quite a trivial incident. I've heard it said that a good landing is one where you can walk away, and a great landing is one where you can reuse the plane; in general, you have to have a less-than-good landing for it to deserve an article. This is a good landing, and it doesn't pass WP:GNG. Nyttend (talk) 04:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable; even the article itself says it's the 2nd crash so far in 2010 at Winter Haven. -R. S. Shaw (talk) 04:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.