Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winnipeg Green Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Winnipeg Green Party

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Several reasons for potential deletion - the party has never had a successful candidate elected, the article is a WP:COATRACK for those unsuccessful candidates, and there is no substantial coverage for the party at all available online. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 12:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 12:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 12:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 12:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 12:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: it is not necessary for sources to be online to be considered for notability, per Wikipedia:Verifiability#Access_to_sources.--TM 13:44, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A municipal party? That only ran in one city election? And lost? Reywas92^Talk 17:39, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:POLOUTCOMES. We have tended to delete smaller Green party committees and conferences. Bearian (talk) 01:08, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Green Party of Manitoba.--TM 19:47, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Namiba one of the only reliable things we do know about this subject is that it’s not the same as the GP of Manitoba, so this would make a merge inappropriate imv. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:21, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. it's just not notable enough. It has been tagged with a template questioning its notability since 2017. It was a municipal party that fielded candidates in a single election, of whom none were elected. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 20:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per not only nomination but also the points listed by my colleagues above.TH1980 (talk) 01:46, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.