Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winkelmann clamp
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:34, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Winkelmann clamp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only source is the manufacturer's website. The other source is a dead link, looking at it on Internet Archive, it is a secondary source who's main source is also the manufacturer's websites. No other sources can be found online. 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 05:36, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Also, it looks like all other previous articles about circumcision surgical devices were merged into Circumcision surgical procedure, and I don't see how this one can be any more notable. 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 02:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.