Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windy Lampson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete without prejudice to recreation if substantiated by reliable sources. Ty 04:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Windy Lampson

Fails Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals couple of local awards exhibitions does not make artist notable GameKeeper (talk) 06:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: 83 Google hits [1], and only a single reliable source among them, provided that this "Times-News" is one. Nothing to presume this person passes WP:BIO, and I'm interested in sourcing for the "internationally recognized" remark, because none of those hits reflect anything of the sort. RGTraynor 07:55, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No books to cite. No arguments for why you shouldn't delete the article. All information is reputable, yet cannot be cited. However, I would like to know what does make an artist notable. Perhaps provide a link to Wikipedia's least notable artist so others will know what it takes to be accepted by Wikipedia's standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.33.42.113 (talk) 17:14, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals provides a list of criteria for notability in this area. If you think at some future date Windy Lampson does then fulfill the criteria you can apply for an undelete to get this information back at WP:DRV. I had a brief look through the deletion reviews, I found this one recently that survived a deletion review Rick Bartow, I don't think this is the minimum standard but it is hard to find the 'least notable', I am 99% sure that there will be artists listed in wikipedia that should be deleted but have not been nominated for deletion yet. The review details are here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Bartow. GameKeeper (talk) 19:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 19:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless "award-winning, internationally recognized" is substantiated - the two very recent references don't bear this out. For my money Carlo Frigerio, though not modern, is perhaps our narrowest squeak through here. Rick Bartow was a clear keep to my mind. Johnbod (talk) 01:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Simply doesn't have a strong case here..Modernist (talk) 19:57, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.