Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windsor Viper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I considered a redirect but this weapon is not currently mentioned by name in the article. If it's added later then a redirect can be created. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Windsor Viper[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable fictional firearm doesn't warrant an article. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 22:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- unsourced article about a minor element of a video game. Nothing to merge, and unlikely search term. Reyk _YO! 06:33, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Reyk's arguments. RJFJR (talk) 21:34, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the videogame. Redirects are cheap and nothing else needs this name at the moment. Jclemens (talk) 20:10, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to the video game. This gun looks like a minor element even in the game's context, and the article has no references whatsoever. JIP | Talk 08:03, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Delete - per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy Sword weapons typically are not notable enough to merit their own page. Similar AfDs have also noted that we should not Redirect either. If one of the most notable and recognizable weapons in the last five years can't satisfy WP:GNG, there's no way this will. --Teancum (talk) 17:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - viable search term. Marasmusine (talk) 14:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and/or redirect due to lack of third-party sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:56, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.