Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windom Earle
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Twin Peaks characters#Windom Earle. – sgeureka t•c 18:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Windom Earle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is possible both WP:FANCRUFT & WP:JUNK, I'm thinking if deletion of the article were to occur, the description of the character could be mergerd into the article about the characters of Twin Peaks. Pahiy (talk) 17:41, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:47, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Twin Peaks characters - He actually already has a lengthy entry on the main Twin Peaks character list, that actually goes more in depth than this current article does. There is really nothing to merge, as a result, but redirecting to the character list is definitely a good idea. Rorshacma (talk) 21:38, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Twin Peaks characters per Rorshacma. Aoba47 (talk) 22:10, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Twin Peaks characters. Agreed with comments above - Jay (talk) 06:56, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect per above. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Twin Peaks characters, where they are already mentioned. Not enough notability for a standalone article.Onel5969 TT me 15:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.