Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winckley Street

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 23:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Winckley Street[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article reads like a press release, created by user with potential WP:COI
Does not appear to meet WP:GNG as only ghits are non-notable businesses, and no gnews other than passing mention. It is a minor shopping street containing no notable businesses, residents or buildings
Appears to be WP:PROMO for businesses in the street Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 15:53, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable at all. Dough 48 72 22:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The street has three listed buildings, one notable person (Francis Thompson) was born there but there's not much on the local newspaper's site (only one page would be significant coverage[1]) or other sources. Peter James (talk) 22:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article is only a directory. Agree with nom. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:11, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.