Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WinAsm Studio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:43, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WinAsm Studio[edit]

I put an advert tag on this article in July. Nobody's touched it since, so now I'm not even sure it's notable. Mbarbier (talk) 05:07, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it's not notable. The article is written like an ad, and so the text is tainted. Best to get rid of it. - Richard Cavell (talk) 09:49, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:00, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Simply put... the software fails notability standards. --Pmedema (talk) 19:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. And express surprise that anyone's still using MASM. JulesH (talk) 21:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC) (developer of parts of Netwide Assembler, so perhaps not entirely independent...)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.