Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilson Heights, Toronto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Clanton Park. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wilson Heights, Toronto[edit]

Does not assert notability and most of the information anyways is in the article Clanton Park. A Knight Who Says Ni suggested the deletion. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 12:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Only articles about real people, organizations and musical recordings need to assert notability. Places of reasonable size are inherently notable. AngoraFish 木 12:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, this is a clear redirect to Clanton Park. This did not need to come to AFD. Go on, be bold. AngoraFish 木 12:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Verifiable place ... and news sources mentioned it in a Riding reorganization. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 12:30, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's likely a reference to Wilson Heights (electoral district), not the neighbourhood. Mind matrix 23:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC) t[reply]
Merge and redirect to Clanton Park. This is a stub which says little more than it is a part of Clanton Park. It is better placed in context of the whole neighbourhood. DoubleBlue (talk) 05:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Clanton Park, without prejudice against the possibility of moving the merged article back to the Wilson Heights title if there's a consensus to do so — there may be some POV debate over which is the better name for the article, but there's no value in having two separate articles about the same topic. Bearcat (talk) 17:40, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Clanton Park, since it represents a portion of that neighbourhood, and there isn't anything unique or distinguishing noted in the article. Mind matrix 23:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.