Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Ramage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:37, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

William Ramage[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is asserted, but I have been unable to verify the claims in the article. I have done this Google News Archive search and this one and have been unable to find any substantial sources. Cunard (talk) 05:08, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

delete There is no indication why he is considered important in his field in any way. -Jordgette (talk) 06:08, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I couldn't find any sources corroborating the claims made in the article. No sources have been provided in the last week. If sources are found someday, this could be undeleted. Abductive (reasoning) 02:27, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.