Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William R. James
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 23:26, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- William R. James (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable businessman. A Gsearch provides no substantial 3rd party sources. All the links in the article are dead. GNews archive search shows nothing for "William R. James"+radnor. The bio in the Radnor company brochure doesn't indicate anyone of any notability.[1]. Fails WP:BIO. Tassedethe (talk) 01:13, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 10:34, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This seems like basic housekeeping — an essentially unsourced stub about a seemingly non-notable businessman. Probably should have been stopped at the front gate by a page patroller. Carrite (talk) 16:51, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:59, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable for his job titleCurb Chain (talk) 08:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.