Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Morean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jabil Circuit. The nominator has provided a reasoned rationale for deletion, and two users have provided reasoned rationales for redirection. Per the overall input in this discussion (which was rather low), general consensus is for redirection. Of note is that more user input here would have been optimal. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

William Morean[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No longer president of Jabil Circuit, if that ever made him notable. Now the only thing standing in his article is him being a billionaire and member of the 2006 Forbes 400. See jabil.com. -rayukk | talk 22:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC) rayukk | talk 22:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Jabil Circuit of which he was (and so will remain) a founder. Useless article right now but maybe someone could make something of it. Thincat (talk) 09:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jabil Circuit; I'm seeing very passing mentions in various company directories only. Should RS manifest themselves, the article could be reinstated. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.