Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William James Maloney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:50, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

William James Maloney[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG is definitely not met, and I can't see that WP:NPROF is met, either. The only independent sources are two pieces in The Journal News – the rest is his own books and articles. He is also not notable per WP:NAUTHOR. He is listed in the article as a "co-author" of The ADA Practical Guide to Substance Use Disorders and Safe Prescribing but in fact he is the co-author of one chapter in that publication; his Medical Lives of History's Famous People has no reviews I can find; and his remaining four books are from a vanity publisher (Anaphora Literary Press), and are also not reviewed in any independent publication. bonadea contributions talk 15:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and New York. bonadea contributions talk 15:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He does not seem to have a lot of academic reputation, definitely not enough for WP:SCHOLAR. I have entertained the possibility of WP:NAUTHOR for his two major publications. One, The ADA Practical Guide etc., might be notable, but he has co-written a single chapter in a pretty large collection, it's not exactly a monograph that would substantiate his expertise. Medical Lives was published by Bentham, which is pretty much a borderline vanity press. Overall, I find neither WP:SCHOLAR, nor WP:NAUTHOR substantiates notability. Ergo delete.Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.