Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Edward Haesche

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) DrStrauss talk 11:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

William Edward Haesche[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Search for sources reveals no indication of significance per WP:ANYBIO or WP:MUSICBIO. DrStrauss talk 14:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google books shows several other sources, and WorldCat shows a long list of published works, and at least one article about him. Therefore, it should be possible to write a proper article. . WP:BEFORE? . DGG ( talk ) 22:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Just because the author didn't find any sources at the time of creation does not mean sources don't exist. See Music Sack for example: http://www.musicsack.com/PersonFMTDetail.cfm?PersonPK=100034367 . I would think other sources could be found in websites that have digitized newspapers. -- kosboot (talk) 23:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – he's covered in several encyclopedias. Note: his name is Edwin in all sources, not Edward. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 07:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Michael and DGG, needs work though and I can understand why it was nominated.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.