Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Bachovchin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep

William Bachovchin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

he has no real claim to notability and seems promotional 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 12:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Article was 2 minutes old when you nominated it, doesn't seem like you did of a WP:BEFORE search to base your opinion on. Fram (talk) 12:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ah, ok can i cancel an AfD? 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 13:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you can see the advice at WP:WITHDRAWN. Fram (talk) 13:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Massachusetts. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep: per Fram, and I strongly advise that the nom slow his roll. Ravenswing 13:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep per above. No real evidence that a WP:BEFORE has been performed. I suggest the nom withdraw this AFD. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep per above. AFD nominator really needs to slow down on AFD. WP:BEFORE applies to this as well. Sarrail (talk) 15:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.