Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willa Sandmeyer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 09:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Willa Sandmeyer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No non-routine coverage of this former TV anchor and an obvious WP:GNG fail. Previously nominated in the 48-article AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, which closed as a procedural keep due to the size of the bundle. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Television, and California. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The entire article uses only one source. killer bee  09:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - article has since been improved. Kazamzam (talk) 19:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: she has received Emmy Awards and the Mark Twain Award, making her a notable broadcast journalist.Rublamb (talk) 03:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rublamb One thing that is not often said but should be a disclaimer about every AfD nomination of an American broadcast journalist is that the Emmy Awards are regional (in this case, Los Angeles). I have argued they don't confer notability multiple times at AfD. I'm not personally convinced that the 1984 LA Times story is enough yet? Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 20:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Local Emmys do not confirm notability here. Coverage is simply routine confirmation of where the person works and what they've done in their job over the years. Oaktree b (talk) 20:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. According to WP:SINGLESOURCE, one source is a wake-up call, but not enough reason to remove an article. Especially since there are already more references now. Suitskvarts (talk) 11:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:18, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 17:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: None of the sources provide SIGCOV, so fails GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 17:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There's at least one source that easily provides significant coverage of this individual: a multi-page profile piece in The Los Angeles Times (1 2 3). My struggle has been finding a second one; the best I could come up with was a 2003 article in Television Week (describing how she almost died on-the-job) and a non-independent thing describing her retirement, but neither of those are great for notability purposes. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.