Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will Gilchrist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will Gilchrist

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a biographical article is about an athlete in the British Universities American Football League, which I don't believe satisfies WP:ATHLETE. He supposedly will be drafted to the NFL in 2010, but this claim, and the entire article, is unsourced. A Google search turns up no hits that demonstrate this athlete meets our notability guidelines. PDCook (talk) 15:22, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A Google search only yields profile and statistics pages. I do not find any articles or secondary sources that suggests the player is notable, hence he does not meat WP:BIO. He has not played a game at the highest level of his sport so he does not meat WP:Athlete. I would also like to add that whether he gets drafted or not is irrelevant, as he has to actually play a game to be considered notable under WP:Athlete, at least based on my interpretation of that section. MATThematical (talk) 23:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I didn't mean to suggest that being drafted would satisfy WP:ATHLETE. I only mentioned it because it was the closest thing to any assertion of notability in the article. PDCook (talk) 01:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Per the nomination, fails WP:ATHLETE and nothing sugests he meets any other potential notability criteria. PackerMania (talk) 02:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Based on a search of the NewsBank database, as a supplement to the google search by MATThematical, I found no non-trivial coverage of this player. Cbl62 (talk) 07:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.