Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilfred Gomez Malong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfred Gomez Malong

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested. Literally just a run-of-the-mill police officer. Completely non-notable. Curbon7 (talk) 03:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 03:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 03:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 03:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete Now, every former police officer wants a page! This is far from passing WP:N. Ode+Joy (talk) 10:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 09:46, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there's no assertion of notability here.Brayan ocaner (talk) 10:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.