Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiley X

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 03:08, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiley X[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable business, nothing for sourcing found beyond press-releases. Sources used in the article are blogs and the like. Oaktree b (talk) 16:36, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

10 minutes after publication but okay :) Books are not blogs. The business is not non-notable as it's top in its niche. Vellaris321 (talk) 16:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

actually 6 mins Vellaris321 (talk) 16:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notability is seen here. It's covered in relevant books. --Vellaris321 (talk) 17:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are no (well, one) books used as sourcing, that one is only a brief mention. The rest are paid-for PR pieces. Please add them here if you have better sources. Oaktree b (talk) 18:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per notability gained through combined factors: copany's strong military connection (USA and other countreis armies buy its products for military actively) and it looks like the subject is kind of the first protective eyewear company and it works since 1980s. Rodgers V (talk) 16:06, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sourcing in the article is currently sufficient to indicate general notability. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 02:50, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.