Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wildlife of Pikmin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. east.718 at 18:08, 11/3/2007

Wildlife of Pikmin[edit]

The article is nothing more than an enemy guide - while some may say the same about the Mario/Zelda enemy lists, at least they have more history, and at least the lists don't have every single variation of the various enemies, unlike this. And before anyone says that there is no guide content, this article describes the strength of the creature, the habits of the creature, the danger level of the creature, calls one of them the "most mysterious creatures in the game", etc. The only possible way to avoid deletion would be to wipe the entire article and start it over, since every single sentence is broken. A Link to the Past (talk) 22:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Start from absolute scratch? You are not serious. THROUGH FIRE JUSTICE IS SERVED! 23:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that comments that are nothing more than calling various members of various species "dangerous", "strong", or "mysterious" are appropriate? - A Link to the Past (talk) 23:57, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's new to me. I've never heard of blanking an article to "improve" it. Seems to me that eliminating all of the good sentences (Which, if you really look at them, there are some.) would be of absolutely no help whatsoever. This article is still, I believe, in the rewrite stage. There was lots more game-cruft a while back, and now it is way better. I'll add some more to this page later, I've got to go ATM.

--Kirby-oh 15:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Borderline gamecruft. No notabilty outside of the game. Ridernyc 22:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm not sure as to whether this violates the policies for deletion, but this is a bit useless by itself. I think that it should be merged with the Pikmin articles. Koryu Obihiro 14:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 08:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no independent reliable sources cited to establish the real-world notability of these fictional creatures. Miremare 23:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.