Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikitruth (7th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep per unanimous recommendation. Thryduulf (talk) 23:16, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitruth[edit]

Fails WP:WEB and WP:NOTNEWS. Only third-party source is a single news report in 2007, nothing since then, site isn't even active any more. *** Crotalus *** 20:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Plenty of coverage. Notability is not temporary. This will probably end up SNOWy. --Cybercobra (talk) 20:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Close This has survived AfD seven times - notability is not temporary even if the site hasn't been active in years. Coverage is not an issue, just needs to be expanded. - 2 ... says you, says me 20:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Close there are plenty of things that are no longer active which still remain notable. So what? JBsupreme (talk) 00:38, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Historical reference. Kau si ll 07:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
'KEEP TELL THE WIKITRUTH! Chuthya (talk) 14:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per Cybercobra Chzz ► 15:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Notability does not have an expiration date. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 18:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.